Comments posted organically
SelectSmart.com Homepage
Display Order:

Turley: The "haymaker" in Supreme Court arguments. Chief Justice Roberts. "Openly mocking of DC Circuit."
Law by HatetheSwamp     April 26, 2024 5:59 am (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: oldedude (5 comments) [146 views]


pb's Legal Goobers #s 2 & 3: The NY v Trump case is collapsing
Law by HatetheSwamp     April 26, 2024 3:43 am (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: HatetheSwamp (4 comments) [26 views]


The Oval Office Oaf calls for "Four more years. Pause."
Entertainment by HatetheSwamp     April 24, 2024 2:56 pm (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: oldedude (4 comments) [76 views]


Republicans: Do you know where your political donations are?
Politics by Curt_Anderson     April 24, 2024 6:12 pm (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: oldedude (7 comments) [328 views]


The latest general election polls from this weekend reveal something interesting.
Politics by Curt_Anderson     April 22, 2024 11:03 am (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: HatetheSwamp (10 comments) [423 views]


So Ukraine got money.
Military by oldedude     April 24, 2024 3:58 am (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: Indy! (6 comments) [90 views]


Donna may be getting her wish granted: Gateway Pundit to file for bankruptcy
Law by Curt_Anderson     April 24, 2024 7:28 pm (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: Indy! (1 comments) [31 views]


James Comer hopes for divine intervention to save him from embarrassing impeachment fiasco.
Politics by Curt_Anderson     April 24, 2024 7:05 pm (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: Indy! (2 comments) [77 views]


Trump, Giuliani, Meadows are unindicted co-conspirators in Michigan fake elector case, hearing reveals
Law by Curt_Anderson     April 24, 2024 4:53 pm (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: Ponderer (3 comments) [38 views]


Russia is even more furious over vote by Congress to support Ukraine than MTG.
Politics by Curt_Anderson     April 21, 2024 6:09 pm (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: oldedude (11 comments) [641 views]


Crime selectors, pages, etc.
So, Curt, can you still say that there's "NO EVIDENCE" that Joe was involved in the Crime Family?
By HatetheSwamp
March 1, 2024 6:33 am
Category: Crime

(0.0 from 0 votes)
Rules of the Post

SelectSmart.com SelectSmart.com SelectSmart.com


Rate this article
5 Stars
4 Stars
3 Stars
2 Stars
1 Star
0 Stars
(5=best, 0=poor)

I ask because you've been adamant. And, based on his testimony, Hunter seems to have acknowledged that there is evidence... but that the truth ain't what it seems... because he's an EFFIN drunken liar.

UNDERSTAND. Evidence ain't proof.

So, based on the testimony? Are you willing to admit that pb's been right all along, i.e., that evidence pointing to President Biden does exist?

FYI:

"I am sitting here with my father and we would like to understand why the commitment made has not been fulfilled. Tell the director that I would like to resolve this now before it gets out of hand, and now means tonight. And, Z, if I get a call or text from anyone involved in this other than you, Zhang, or the chairman, I will make certain that between the man sitting next to me and every person he knows and my ability to forever hold a grudge that you will regret not following my direction. I am sitting here waiting for the call with my father."

Hmmmmm?

Comments Start Below


The views and claims expressed by contributors are their own and do not necessarily reflect the views and beliefs of SelectSmart.com. Not every statement made here can be assumed to be a fact.
Comments on "So, Curt, can you still say that there's "NO EVIDENCE" that Joe was involved in the Crime Family?":

  1. by Curt_Anderson on March 1, 2024 9:26 am
    As I sit here typing this post, I am joined by four prominent local faith leaders. Speaking on behalf of myself, the reverend, the priest, the rabbi and the imam, we can assure you there is no evidence of any wrongdoing by Joe Biden.

    As you know, I posted a link to the entire transcript of the Hunter Biden testimony. I found no bombshells or smoking guns.


  2. by HatetheSwamp on March 1, 2024 10:05 am

    And, I posted the Whatsapp text in which Hunter claims that Joe's in the room with him... and awaiting a payment.


  3. by Curt_Anderson on March 1, 2024 10:26 am
    So I met your challenge and said there is NO EVIDENCE incriminating Joe Biden.

    Can you say the text attributed to Hunter Biden is “the best” of the Republicans’ very weak, pathetic case.


  4. by HatetheSwamp on March 1, 2024 10:57 am

    By no means. But, Curt, Hunter acknowledged that he wrote that text and sent it.

    He's admitting that the text is his.


  5. by Curt_Anderson on March 1, 2024 11:14 am
    HtS,
    Hunter did not admit the text was his. Read the testimony. Go to page 104 of the transcript. It certainly is not evidence that Joe was actually sitting next to Hunter.

    Q Do you have any recollection of sending these?
    7 A No, but I've seen this and --
    8 Mr. Lowell. Is there a question?
    9 . Yes. Does he have a recollection of sending the message?
    10 The Witness. And I do not, but I do know this. I have now seen it, which it's
    11 been presented. I would say two things about this message.
    12 Mr. Nadler. Can you speak up?
    13 The Witness. I would say two things about this message. The first thing is this.
    14 Is that the Zhao that this is sent to is not the Zhao that was connected to CEFC.
    15 BY :
    16 Q Okay.
    17 A Which I think is the best indication of how out of my mind I was at this
    18 moment in time.
    19 Again, I don't -- my addiction is not an excuse, but I can tell you this: I am more
    20 embarrassed of this text message, if it actually did come from me, than any text message
    21 I've ever sent.
    22 The fact of the matter is, is that there's no other text message that you have in
    23 which I say anything remotely to this. And I was out of my mind.
    24 I can also tell you this: My father was not sitting next to me. My father had no
    25 awareness. My father had no awareness of the business that I was doing. My father
    106
    1 never benefited from any of the business that I was doing.
    2 And so, I take full responsibility for being an absolute ass and idiot when I sent this
    3 message, if I did send this message.
    4 Q Okay.


  6. by Indy! on March 1, 2024 11:15 am

    I'm sitting here with a liar, a low rent con artist, a racist and a buffoon.... his name is Donald Trump.


  7. by HatetheSwamp on March 1, 2024 11:24 am

    And I was out of my mind.
    24 I can also tell you this: My father was not sitting next to me.


    This is laughable. Seriously.

    I didn't do it. And. If I did, I was bombed...AND...also, I was lying about my dad, whom I dearly love...

    ...But, trust me, I'm telling the truth now.


    Baha.


  8. by Curt_Anderson on March 1, 2024 11:59 am
    Hunter Biden, unlike Donald Trump, did not invoke his Fifth Amendment rights. He was under oath when he answered each and every question asked of him. If he lied at any point, he could be charged with perjury.

    Nancy Mace claimed Hunter was dishonest in answering questions. Of course she was not under oath when she made that claim. If she has any credibility she should be able to cite and quote Hunter Biden's supposed lies. For the sake of the crumbling Republican case against Joe Biden, you'd think she would want to prove Hunter lied.


  9. by HatetheSwamp on March 1, 2024 12:02 pm

    Yeah. Hunter didn't claim his 5th Amendment right.

    But,... for the gazillionth time... how does Trump being more evil than Hitler justify what Joe (Hunter) did!!!!!?


  10. by Curt_Anderson on March 1, 2024 12:14 pm
    I disagree that Trump is more evil than Hitler, but I will defend your right to say it.

    Trump is more of a scofflaw and grifter than Hitler.

    The Republicans case against Joe Biden never was substantial and is an increasing embarrassment to the GOP. To quote one FOX News host, "This is the path that they’ve chosen to take, and honestly I’m surprised that they have this high of a threshold for humiliation, every witness they have called has decimated their argument."

    independent.co.uk


  11. by HatetheSwamp on March 1, 2024 12:23 pm

    Jessica Tarlov. Do you know who she is? You must. You cite Fox News far more than all of the rest of us combined. So? Who's Jessica?

    The Republicans case against Joe Biden never was substantial and is an increasing embarrassment to the GOP.

    So say you...

    ...BUT... can you still say that there's no evidence that Joe was involved in the Crime Family?


  12. by Curt_Anderson on March 1, 2024 12:38 pm
    Just to be clear, it appears that you are now reduced to making a semantic argument about what constitutes "evidence". I fondly remember you talking about "bombshells" which never materialized. I know how you must feel. 😞


  13. by HatetheSwamp on March 1, 2024 12:55 pm

    I ain't arguing anything.

    I am asking. Can you still say that there is no EVIDENCE yada yada yada.


  14. by Curt_Anderson on March 1, 2024 1:00 pm
    A question which I've answered. See your comment #7 and my #8 for example.
    selectsmart.com


  15. by HatetheSwamp on March 1, 2024 1:17 pm

    Your answer is "Trump Trump Trump is bad?"

    Hunter Biden, unlike Donald Trump, did not invoke his Fifth Amendment rights.


Go To Top

Comment on: "So, Curt, can you still say that there's "NO EVIDENCE" that Joe was involved in the Crime Family?"


* Anonymous comments are subject to approval before they appear. Cookies Consent Policy & Privacy Statement. All Rights Reserved. SelectSmart® is a registered trademark. | Contact SelectSmart.com | Advertise on SelectSmart.com | This site is for sale!

Find old posts & articles

Articles by category:

SelectSmart.com
Report spam & abuse
SelectSmart.com home page